Carman Callahan and Ingham, LLC
HomeAttorneysFirm SummaryAreas of PracticeFavorable DecisionsLegal ResourcesDirections
In 1928 the firm was formed by the late Honorable Willis B. Carman, Sr. as a general practice law firm. The firm continues this tradition, and today concentrates its practice in Insurance Defense Litigation, Real Estate, Banking Law, Commercial and Residential Banking and Trusts and Estates.

Carman, Callahan & Ingham has a long history of providing clients with the highest quality, cost effective legal services.

What's New

Helping Families in Need
CC&I, along with other local businesses, is sponsoring a drive to help local families in need this holiday season. We are adopting several local families who need some extra help. We are collecting gift cards, non-perishable food items, toys and clothes (for boys ages 6, 7, 8, 14 and 16 and girls ages 4 and 11). Cash donations can not be accepted. Please bring your donations to our office by December 10th. Thank you and happy holidays!

 

Recent Favorable Verdicts
James M. Carman, Esq
., a partner at CC&I, recently obtained a defense verdict in the case of Sara Romero v. Elrac.  Following testimony by the Defendant that she was not involved in the motor vehicle accident that formed the basis of Plaintiff’s claim, despite Plaintiff’s testimony otherwise, the Jury reached a determination that the Defendant was not liable for the accident. 
See more favorable verdicts.

 

Recent Favorable Appellate Decisions
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company a/s/o Stephen Maffee v. New York State Insurance Fund, (Appellate Division, Second Department, Docket Number 5315/07)
Order Date: January 8, 2008

CC&I filed an appeal of a lower court decision which denied Progressive’s motion to vacate an arbitration award that required Progressive to reimburse No-Fault first party payments paid by the New York State Insurance Fund to its employee.  The employee was a garbage collector and was struck by Progressive’s insured’s vehicle, while he was standing in the street near his garbage truck.  An arbitrator determined that the garbage truck was involved in the accident, despite the fact that there was no contact between the Progressive vehicle and the garbage truck, and therefore the New York State Insurance Fund was permitted reimbursement of the No-Fault benefits it paid, under Insurance Law §5105.  Progressive filed a motion to vacate the arbitration award, which was denied.  On appeal, CC&I argued that the decision lacked any rational basis, as the garbage truck was not involved in the accident.  The Second Department agreed with this position, and reversed the lower court’s decision.

See more favorable decisions...

Home | Attorneys | Firm Summary | Areas of Practice | Favorable Decisions | Legal Resources